Die doppelte Katasrophe – Klima und Kultur in der europäischen Hungerkrise 1770–1772
Professor i klima- og miljøhistorie ved IAKH, Dominik Collet, har publisert monografien Die doppelte Katasrophe – Klima und Kultur in der europäischen Hungerkrise 1770–1772.
Foto: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
Mot slutten av 1700-tallet fant en katastrofal sultkatastrofe sted i Europa. Hungersnøden kostet flere hundretusen liv og forårsaket massemigrasjon, antisemittiske utspring og diskriminering, men også politisk reform og utvikling av nye vitenskapsgrener. Professor Collet tar i denne boken for seg katastrofeårene og gjennomfører en tverrfaglig analyse av hvordan samfunnenene møtte og tolket krisen.
Fra forlagets engelskspråklige beskrivelse:
At the end of the 18th century Europe suffered one of the worst subsistence crises of the Little Ice Age. The disastrous fatality of this 'double' catastrophe was a result of both climate and culture. The effects were felt throughout Europe and claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. The crisis initiated mass migration, discrimination and bouts of antisemitism but also political reform, early humanitarianism and new fields of science. It linked the revolts of the Steelboys in Ireland with the absolutist coup in Sweden and the bourgeois reform movements in Saxony.
Dominik Collet draws on these crises to trace, how climate anomalies have been 'socialised' in the past and to highlight the surprising plurality of societal responses. His book calls for a socionatural approach to writing history. It narrates an entangled history of environment and society that pursues the links between short-term events and long-term, socio-ecological structures. Due to these interconnections the crisis of the 1770s reveals the deeper, underlying conflicts of the affected societies in the fields of economy, ecology and governance. They reveal the inherent vulnerability of Europe's 'grain societies' and sketch the actions of governments, subjects and 'experts'. In this complex environment catastrophes constitute both social and natural disasters. The study challenges social and climatic determinism and illustrates that more dynamic connections of climate and culture are both necessary and feasible. It calls for a fresh perspective that - instead of separating nature and culture - treats nature as history