Jenny Krutzinna

Forsker - Institutt for medier og kommunikasjon

English version of this page

E-post jenny.krutzinna@media.uio.no

Brukernavn

Besøksadresse Gaustadalléen 21 Forskningsparken 0349 Oslo

Postadresse Postboks 1093 Blindern 0317 Oslo

Last ned visittkort

Faglige interesser

For mer informasjon, se min engelske side.

Undervisning

Forskningsetikk for MA-studenter i offentlig administrasjon, UiB
Barns rettigheter i Norge, NLA Høgskulen, Bergen

Bakgrunn

2019-22 Seniorforsker, Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, UiB
2018-19 Postdoktor, Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, UiB
2017-18 Postdoktor, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford
2013-17 Coworking Space gründer og leder, Frankfurt/Main
2004-12 Ulike privatsektorstillinger, bl.a. Databeskyttelsesansvarlig og seniorkonsulent i Big Data Analytics i farmasøytisk industri

Utdanning

2014-17 PhD in Bioethics and Medical Jurisprudence, University of Manchester
2010-12 MA in Healthcare Ethics and Law, University of Manchester
2001-04 MA (Oxon) in Jurisprudence, University of Oxford

Verv

Medlem av "Editorial Advisory Board" og assisterende redaktør ved Clinical Ethics

Independent Ethics Advisor, "The Micro-Level Effects of Civil Wars on Multiple Dimensions of Women's Empowerment" (WarEffects) funded by the European Research Council (PI: Carlo Koos)

Emneord: Trivsel, etikk, barns rettigheter, solidaritet, funksjonshemming, interseksjonalitet, Big Data, AI, kvalitativ samfunnsvitenskap, bioetikk, dataetikk

Kriz, Katrin; Krutzinna, Jenny; Poso, Tarja & Skivenes, Marit (2022). The invisible child. A comparative study of newborn removal judgments from a Child Equality Perspective (cep) . The International Journal of Children's Rights. ISSN 0927-5568. 30(3), s. 644–674. doi: 10.1163/15718182-30030006. Vis sammendrag
We know little about how children are portrayed in care order cases. Using a Child Equality Perspective (cep), which demands the child’s presence in proceedings even for children who are not capable of partaking fully in the decision-making process, we examine a sample of 216 judgments from 8 countries involving 220 infants. Our study reveals that the children remain largely invisible, but with clear country differences. Children’s invisibility constitutes a fundamental obstacle for children being “equal” in the judgments that will shape the child’s future. This invisibility raises concerns about the quality of the judicial decisions about the child’s best interest.
Braun, Matthias & Krutzinna, Jenny (2022). Digital twins and the ethics of health decision-making concerning children. Patterns. ISSN 2666-3899. 3(4). doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100469.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2022). Who is “The Child”? Best Interests and Individuality of Children in Discretionary Decision-Making. The International Journal of Children's Rights. ISSN 0927-5568. 30(1), s. 120–145. doi: 10.1163/15718182-30010005. Vis sammendrag
While the substantiation of “best interests” has received much attention, the question of how “the child” is conceptualised to ensure any action taken or decision made is in the particular child’s best interests has been largely neglected. In this paper, I argue that the lack of robust understanding of who “the child” is, means that we continue to make many generalisations and category-based assumptions in determining the child’s best interests. In addressing the challenge of doing right by the individual child, I propose a three-step approach based on a theoretical model of the child that avoids presumptions about child-typical needs and insists on an assessment of the child’s individual characteristics, needs, qualities and circumstances, making it the only conceptualisation fully meeting the child centrism criterion required by children’s rights as determined by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Czypionka, Thomas; Iftekhar, Emil; Prainsack, Barbara; Priesemann, Viola; Bauer, Simon & Calero Valdez, Andre [Vis alle 23 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2022). The benefits, costs and feasibility of a low incidence COVID-19 strategy. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. ISSN 2666-7762. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100294. Vis sammendrag
In the summer of 2021, European governments removed most NPIs after experiencing prolonged second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most countries failed to achieve immunization rates high enough to avoid resurgence of the virus. Public health strategies for autumn and winter 2021 have ranged from countries aiming at low incidence by re-introducing NPIs to accepting high incidence levels. However, such high incidence strategies almost certainly lead to the very consequences that they seek to avoid: restrictions that harm people and economies. At high incidence, the important pandemic containment measure ‘test-trace-isolate-support’ becomes inefficient. At that point, the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its numerous harmful consequences can likely only be controlled through restrictions. We argue that all European countries need to pursue a low incidence strategy in a coordinated manner. Such an endeavour can only be successful if it is built on open communication and trust.
Iftekhar, Emil; Priesemann, Viola; Balling, Rudi; Bauer, Simon; Beutels, Philippe & Calero Valdez, Andre [Vis alle 34 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: an expert consultation. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. ISSN 2666-7762. 8. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100185. Vis sammendrag
How will the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic develop in the coming months and years? Based on an expert survey, we examine key aspects that are likely to influence the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. The challenges and developments will strongly depend on the progress of national and global vaccination programs, the emergence and spread of variants of concern (VOCs), and public responses to non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). In the short term, many people remain unvaccinated, VOCs continue to emerge and spread, and mobility and population mixing are expected to increase. Therefore, lifting restrictions too much and too early risk another damaging wave. This challenge remains despite the reduced opportunities for transmission given vaccination progress and reduced indoor mixing in summer 2021. In autumn 2021, increased indoor activity might accelerate the spread again, whilst a necessary reintroduction of NPIs might be too slow. The incidence may strongly rise again, possibly filling intensive care units, if vaccination levels are not high enough. A moderate, adaptive level of NPIs will thus remain necessary. These epidemiological aspects combined with economic, social, and health-related consequences provide a more holistic perspective on the future of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Krutzinna, Jenny & Kriz, Katrin (2021). Adoption from care in Austria. I Skivenes, Marit; Thoburn, June & Poso, Tarja (Red.), Adoption from Care. International Perspectives on Children’s Rights, Family Preservation and State Intervention.. Policy Press. ISSN 9781447351030. s. 87–102.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2021). Creating ‘family’ in adoption from care. I Skivenes, Marit; Thoburn, June & Poso, Tarja (Red.), Adoption from Care. International Perspectives on Children’s Rights, Family Preservation and State Intervention.. Policy Press. ISSN 9781447351030. s. 195–213.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2021). Breaking the cycle: Solidarity with care-leaver mothers. The Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies (DiGeSt). ISSN 2593-0273. 7(2), s. 82–92. Vis sammendrag
Many child protection cases involve care-experienced mothers, which reveals a continuous cycle of mothers who lose their children to social services after having been in state care themselves as children. While the importance of protecting children requires little explanation and forms the justificatory basis for child protection interventions, it is important to remember that care-experienced mothers were once children entrusted to the state’s care, and who arguably have been failed by the statein that their parenting opportunities are significantly reduced. This paper aims to address this underexplored dilemma between protecting children and safeguarding mothering opportunities for care-experienced mothers. Appealing to the concept of solidarity, I arguethat the state has an obligation to increase its compensatory efforts to secure the right of care-experienced women to not only become parents but to be able to beparents, with the aim of breaking the cycle of care experience.
Breen, Claire; Krutzinna, Jenny; Luhamaa, Katre & Skivenes, Marit (2020). Family life for children in state care. An analysis of the European court of human rights’ reasoning on adoption without consent. The International Journal of Children's Rights. ISSN 0927-5568. 28(4), s. 715–747. doi: 10.1163/15718182-28040001.
Krutzinna, Jenny & Skivenes, Marit (2020). Judging parental competence: A cross‐country analysis of judicial decision makers' written assessment of mothers' parenting capacities in newborn removal cases. Child & Family Social Work. ISSN 1356-7500. 26(1), s. 50–60. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12788.
Burns, Kenneth; Križ, Katrin; Krutzinna, Jenny; Luhamaa, Katre; Meysen, Thomas & Pösö, Tarja [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2019). The hidden proceedings - An analysis of accountability of child protection adoption proceedings in eight European jurisdictions. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. ISSN 2213-4506. 6(4), s. 339–371. doi: 10.1163/22134514-00604002. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
Krutzinna, Jenny (2019). Shaping Children: The Pursuit of Normalcy in Pediatric Cognitive Neuro-enhancement. I Nagel, Saskia (Red.), Shaping Children. Ethical and Social Questions that Arise when Enhancing the Young . Springer Nature. ISSN 978-3-030-10677-5. s. 11–24. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-10677-5_2.
Krutzinna, Jenny; Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano (2019). Enabling Posthumous Medical Data Donation: A Plea for the Ethical Utilisation of Personal Health Data. I Krutzinna, Jenny & Floridi, Luciano (Red.), The Ethics of Medical Data Donation. Springer. ISSN 978-3-030-04363-6. s. 163–180. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_11. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
Krutzinna, Jenny & Floridi, Luciano (2019). Ethical Medical Data Donation: A Pressing Issue. I Krutzinna, Jenny & Floridi, Luciano (Red.), The Ethics of Medical Data Donation. Springer. ISSN 978-3-030-04363-6. s. 1–6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_1.
Krutzinna, Jenny; Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano (2019). An Ethical Code for Posthumous Medical Data Donation. I Krutzinna, Jenny & Floridi, Luciano (Red.), The Ethics of Medical Data Donation. Springer. ISSN 978-3-030-04363-6. s. 181–195. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04363-6_12. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
Krutzinna, Jenny; Taddeo, Mariarosaria & Floridi, Luciano (2018). Enabling Posthumous Medical Data Donation: An Appeal for the Ethical Utilisation of Personal Health Data. Science and Engineering Ethics. ISSN 1353-3452. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0067-8.
Krutzinna, Jenny & Floridi, Luciano (2018). Atypical employment and disability in the digital economy: accountability gap leaves disabled app developers’ rights unprotected. Law, Innovation and Technology. ISSN 1757-9961. doi: 10.1080/17579961.2018.1527476.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

Krutzinna, Jenny & Floridi, Luciano (2019). The Ethics of Medical Data Donation. Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-04363-6. 137(1). 198 s.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

Priesemann, Viola; Balling, Rudi; Bauer, Simon; Beutels, Philippe; Calero Valdez, Andre & Cuschieri, Sarah [Vis alle 28 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). Towards a European strategy to address the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet. ISSN 0140-6736. 398(10303), s. 838–839. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736%2821%2901808-0.
Kriz, Katrin; Krutzinna, Jenny; Poso, Tarja & Skivenes, Marit (2021). Decision-making and Participation of Children in the Child Protection System’ - The Invisible Child: The Child’s Perspective in Judicial Decision-Making in Eight European Countries.
Krutzinna, Jenny & Skivenes, Marit (2021). Discretionary reasoning in child protection.
Sandvik, Kristin Bergtora; Dugard, Jackie; Krutzinna, Jenny; Rosenberg, Anette Ringen; Otiene, Andrew & Tindstad, Marie [Vis alle 7 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). Rethinking digitalization and the right to education post-COVID-19.
O'Mahony, Conor; Emberland, Marius; Søvig, Karl Harald; Krutzinna, Jenny & Luhamaa, Katre (2021). European Court of Human Rights on Child Protection & Children's Rights.
Breen, Claire; Krutzinna, Jenny; Luhamaa, Katre & Skivenes, Marit (2021). Family life for children in state care. An analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’ reasoning on adoption without consent.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2021). Simulating (some) individuals in a connected world. Journal of Medical Ethics. ISSN 0306-6800. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107447.
Krutzinna, Jenny & Skivenes, Marit (2021). Judging parental competence: A cross-country analysis of judicial decision-makers’ assessment of parental capacities in newborn removal cases.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2021). The Child Equality Perspective. Securing Children’s Presence in State Decision-Making. .
Krutzinna, Jenny (2021). Stewarding Children’s Data: Striking a balance between Sovereignty and Solidarity.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2021). Barbara Bennett Woodhouse, The Ecology of Childhood. How Our Changing World Threatens Children’s Rights. The International Journal of Children's Rights. ISSN 0927-5568. 29(1), s. 239–243. doi: 10.1163/15718182-29010001.
Luhamaa, Katre & Krutzinna, Jenny (2020). Pedersen et al v. Norway: Progress towards child-centrism at the European Court of Human Rights? . Strasbourg Observers.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2020). Barn i "lockdown": Utfordrer korona-tiltakene barns rettigheter? .
Krutzinna, Jenny (2020). Family Life for Children.
Skivenes, Marit; Krutzinna, Jenny; Luhamaa, Katre; Kriz, Katrin & Engedahl, Marthe (2020). Protecting Children, Creating Citizens.
Meysen, Thomas & Krutzinna, Jenny (2020). Familiengerichtlicher Kinderschutz in Deutschland – Ein internationaler Vergleich anlässlich des „Staufener Missbrauchsfalls“. FF - Forum Familienrecht. ISSN 1433-8696. 24(1), s. 14–17.
Krutzinna, Jenny & Floridi, Luciano (2019). Preface and acknowledgments. Philosophical Studies Series. ISSN 0921-8599. 137.
Krutzinna, Jenny; Skivenes, Marit Sissel Irene & Thoburn, June (2019). Acceptability of family court decision-making in eight jurisdictions. Family Law. ISSN 0014-7281. 49, s. 867–869.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2019). "Best interests at the edge of medicine: Conceptualising the individual child in child protection interventions".
Breen, Claire; Krutzinna, Jenny; Luhamaa, Katre & Skivenes, Marit Sissel Irene (2019). The Child’s Right to Family Life. An analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’ reasoning on adoption without consent.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2019). Ethical issues in Big Data for NCD risk factor surveillance.
Krutzinna, Jenny (2019). Giving yourself? Reflections on the ethics of data donation in healthcare.
Krutzinna, Jenny & Skivenes, Marit (2018). Justifying Removals of Newborn Babies: A Cross-Country Analysis of Judiciary Decision Makers Reasoning of Parental Capacities .
Krutzinna, Jenny; Nygård, Sveinung; Gianella, Camila & Ó Cathaoir, Katharina Eva (2018). Children’s Right to Health: Childhood obesity.
Skivenes, Marit; Krutzinna, Jenny; Luhamaa, Katre; Burns, Kenneth; Kalliomaa-Puha, Laura & Höjer, Staffan [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2018). Children's Right to Child Friendly Justice.
Luhamaa, Katre; Krutzinna, Jenny & Skivenes, Marit (2022). Child’s best interest in child protection legislation of 44 jurisdictions. Centre for Research on Discretion and Paternalism, University of Bergen.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

Publisert 20. juni 2022 15:15 - Sist endret 19. aug. 2022 10:23