Norwegian version of this page

Karin Kukkonen

Professor - Allmenn litteraturvitenskap

Email karin.kukkonen@ilos.uio.no

Phone +47 22 85 48 72

Room NT 730

Username

Visiting address Niels Treschows hus (730)

Postal address Postboks 1003 Blindern 0315 Oslo

Press photo Download business card

(Photo: Luca Ferrante, Rome.)

My research revolves around literature and the human mind. I have investigated questions such as how literature entwines with the our lifeworld, how it models consciousness and how writers work creatively. My long-standing interest in the history of the novel has led me to bring Early-Modern poetics, narratives and literary games into dialogue with today’s cognitive approaches to literature.

I'm the initiator and founding director of LCE – Centre for Literature, Cognition and Emotions. The centre builds on long-term interdisciplinary collaborations with colleagues across literary studies, psychology, linguistics and anthropology. Our LCE Podcast has three seasons available.

Recently, I have completed a book on Creativity and Contingency in Literary Writing. My current project JEUX – Literary Games, Poetics and the Early-Modern Novel is funded by an ERC-Consolidator Grant and investigates how literary games facilitated novelists’ narrative innovations.

I have been awarded the UiO Younger Researcher Prize (2019), and I am an elected member of the Academy of Europe (since 2022).

CV Kukkonen

A full list of my publications can be found on my Google Scholar profile. Most of my publications are available in Open Access under «Publications» below.

Academic interests

Narratology; Poetics; Eighteenth-Century Literature; Seventeenth-Century Literature; Comics and Graphic Novels; Cognitive Literary Study

Earlier Projects

Probability Designs: Literature and Predictive Processing

How the Novel Found its Feet: Embodiment in Eighteenth-Century Fiction

A Prehistory of Cognitive Poetics: Neoclassicism and the Novel

For more on my research and publications, see my profiles on ResearchGate and Google Scholar.

Courses taught

LIT1301 Vestens litteratur antikken til 1700
LIT1302 Vestens litteratur 1700-1900
LIT4340A/LIT4340B Litterært tekststudium I: Mimesis
LIT4310A/LIT4310B Litteraturteoretisk studium I: Cognitive Literary Study
LIT2340 Sjangerstudium: The Makings of a Genre: The Eighteenth-Century Novel
LIT2300 Litteraturtheoretisk emne: The Theory and History of Reading

Tags: Comparative Literature, Narratology, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Seventeenth-Century Literature, Comics and Graphic Novels, Cognitive Poetics

Kukkonen, Karin. (2023). "Literature as Uncertainty Practice: An Anomaly at the End of Literature" DVJS 97: 1143-1152. Read the article here.

Kukkonen, Karin. (2020). Probability Designs: Literature and Predictive Processing. Oxford University Press.

Kukkonen, Karin. (2019). 4E Cognition and Eighteenth-Century Fiction: How the Novel Found its Feet. Oxford University Press.

Kukkonen, Karin (2017). A Prehistory of Cognitive Poetics. Neoclassicism and the Novel. Oxford University Press.

Mézière, Diane; Kaakinen, Johanna K.; Ranta, Emilia; Kukkonen, Karin; Smallwood, Jonathan & Simola, Jaana (2025). Do eye movements reflect readers’ thoughts during reading? Evidence from multidimensional experience sampling and eye movements. Consciousness and Cognition. ISSN 1053-8100. 134. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2025.103918. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
While reading narrative texts, readers’ attention often fluctuates from the text (e.g., immersion) to text-unrelated thoughts (e.g., mind-wandering). Research on mind-wandering and immersion suggests that they influence the reading process differently. In this article, we examine the types of thoughts readers have while reading a literary text. Specifically, we investigated the effect of immersion and mind-wandering on eye-movement behaviour during reading. Fifty-six participants read extracts from a novel while their eye-movements were monitored. Participants’ thoughts were probed using multidimensional experience sampling. We identified four types of thought: Immersion, Mind-wandering, Sub-Vocalization, and Social Episodic Thoughts. We then ran General Additive Mixed Models (GAMMs) to examine the relationship between these thought types and eye movements. Results show that eye movements are influenced by the types of thoughts readers experience while reading literary texts. These results have important implications for the way that mind-wandering is typically investigated, particularly in reading research.
Kukkonen, Karin (2025). Maximal Selves, Narrative Repression and Impossible Structures: Self-Narrative and the Challenge of Literature. Topoi. ISSN 0167-7411. doi: 10.1007/s11245-025-10274-5. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
The present article approaches the issue of self-narrative from the complex case of a “maximal self”. Conceived in contrast to the standard “minimal self”, the “maximal self” is marked by detailed verbal narration, multiple temporalities and multiple imaginary selves. The concept is developed and discussed through the complex case of self-narrative in the TV series Strappare Lungo I Bordi . After an outline of features of the “maximal self” (Sect. 1), I will work towards an account of the narrative effects of deploying the maximal self, such as “narrative repression”, where a very talkative narrator hides major issues of self-narrative in plain sight (Sect. 3), and “imaginary friends”, where imagined selves turn into dialogue partners that may well break through narrative repression (Sect. 5). In the final section, I will position the complexity of the maximal self in the contexts of research on self-narrative in philosophy and literary studies. The article contributes to debates around self-narratives, first, by expanding the conceptual repertoire of self-narratives with the notions of narrative repression and imaginary friends, and second, by showing how these concepts provide new ways for thinking about the links between narrators and emplotment in the process of self-narration.
Haraldsen, Mats & Kukkonen, Karin (2025). Thinking elsewhere: designer environments for religion and literature. Religion, Brain and Behavior. ISSN 2153-599X. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2025.2574276. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
This article investigates how certain kinds of reading and meditation reduce attention to the here-and-now in order to leave room for imaginative experiences in carefully crafted religious and cultural designer environments. The article thereby engages with recent accounts on cultural acquisition and religious beliefs. From the perspective of active inference and 4E cognition, we argue that designer environments allow practitioners to go beyond modulating their predictions according to the minds of others, and instead enable them to go “elsewhere,” that is, to imaginatively experience different sets of probabilities that can change how they predict the world in the here-and-now. Three different works are studied: Amadis of Gaul (1508), a best-selling series of chivalric novels by Garcia de Montalvo, The Spiritual Exercises (1548), a meditation manual by Ignatius of Loyola, as well as Don Quixote (1605 and 1615) by Miguel de Cervantes. These works have in common that they rebuild expectations in relation to the self by positioning it in new environments, and thereby extending the range of experience. Through such thinking “elsewhere” in designer environments, we argue, readers and meditators can modulate their attentional systems so as to perceive and act in the world in new ways.
Kukkonen, Karin; Eriksen, Stefka G.; Trasmundi, Sarah Bro & Kristiansen, Dag-Tore Nordbø (2024). Voices in reading literature. Language Sciences. ISSN 0388-0001. 106. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101664. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Building upon recent studies of historical reading practices and their insights into the bodily and cognitive nature of reading, this article explores the impact of silent and voiced reading on the diverse bodily, cognitive, and emotional engagements with a text. Our starting point is that language is not merely a tool for translating mental content but emerges from and shapes embodied ways of interacting with the world, in this case, a reading-world. First, we present a phonetic analysis based on a pilot study of university students' voiced and silent reading. The overall cognitive act of articulating phonemes based on perception of graphemes is portrayed as an embodied process, particularly evident in instances where readers modify their pronunciation of unfamiliar words or grapheme clusters. Moreover, we observe how readers embody emotions and differentiate between narrators or voices in the text by creatively and dynamically modulating their oral cavity to produce subtle, yet cognitively significant changes in speech sounds. Second, drawing on interview data from the same study, we explore how the two reading conditions influence experiential factors, including perceptions of time, qualities of imagery, and the multiplicity of voices enacted by the reader. Together, these aspects provide insights into the function and value of readers' practices of reading silently and aloud. While, in our study, reading aloud helps modulating local sensitivity to prosodic features that are important for e.g. emotion regulation and comprehension, readers more easily orient themselves in a text when reading silently, strengthening the in-depth experience of settings, characters, and narrators. While the attributes of silent and voiced reading may vary based on expertise, norms, and personal preferences, each mode appears to offer distinctive advantages. We thus conclude by proposing that readers could benefit from alternating between both reading modes, adapting to the specific task at hand. This approach allows for the full realisation of the embodied potential in alignment with the requirements of the task. Additionally, historical practices of reading aloud can inform the study of reading modes, providing a repertoire of possibilities absent in today's reading ecologies dominated by silent reading.
Kukkonen, Karin; Ballaster, Ros; Dumas, Guillaume; Keazor, Henry; Vogel, Juliane & Wheeler, Michael (2024). Creativity and Contingency: Provoking Chance Across the Arts. In Duprat, Anne & James, Alison (Ed.), Figures of Chance: Chance in Theory and Practice. Routledge. ISSN 9781032358659. p. 234–295. Full text in Research Archive
Trasmundi, Sarah Bro & Kukkonen, Karin (2024). Aisthesis, Aesthetics and Cognition: Embodiments in Reading. Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics. ISSN 0252-8169. 47(3), p. 103–119. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2024). Contingency traps: the role of form in creative processes. Neohelicon. ISSN 0324-4652. p. 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11059-024-00741-0. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Abstract Literary texts are already written before they get read, and they are therefore not subject to chance in the same way as encounters in everyday life. However, at the same time, these texts often manage to evoke a strong sense in readers that the events they read about could have turned out otherwise. I propose the notion of the “contingency trap” as a conceptual tool to address this theoretical challenge. This article addresses how authors deploy form in the creative process to integrate contingency in their texts and make it available to their readers in reading. Two interviews with Gwenaëlle Aubry about her essay Saint Phalle serve as the first case study, and her account is contrasted and compared with an analysis of Italo Calvino’s reflections on contingency in literary narrative with particular focus on his Il Castello dei destini incrociati (The Castle of Crossed Destinies, 1973). These authors’ insights into the creative process will then be complemented by research on cognitive processes related to literary creativity in order to sketch a more general theoretical understanding of how form works as a contingency trap.
Kukkonen, Karin (2024). Metagenesis : Manuscripts, and How Metanarration and Metafiction Contribute to Their Analysis. In Hulle, Dirk Van (Eds.), Genetic Narratology : Analysing Narrative Across Versions. Open Book Publishers. ISSN 9781805113997. p. 17–34. doi: 10.11647/obp.0426.02. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
This article proposes that moments of metanarration and metafiction can make an important contribution to the project of a genetic, manuscript-oriented narratology. When literary texts reflect on their own madeness, this may be fictional invention, but it also can serve as a means to (re)focus the analysis of the manuscripts underlying the text. Metagenesis, I suggest, can be used to expand the genetic dossier and to bring manuscript genetics into further dialogue with narratology. It offers in particular the opportunity to draw on insights from embodied approaches to the study of narrative and literature, as well as bring manuscript genetics further into conversations around literary creativity. In the first section, then, I will define metagenesis and sketch out its place in an enlarged genetic dossier. In the second section, I propose an example analysis of two passages from Charlotte Brontë’s writings to demonstrate how metagenetics works in practice. The third section, finally, addresses theoretical and methodological challenges that may arise from such a dialogue between manuscript genetics, narratology and literary studies, and propose a number of ways in which they can be met.
Kukkonen, Karin & Trasmundi, Sarah Bro (2024). Lesegebärden in freier Wildbahn : Ästhetik, Kognition und Praxis. In Hron, Irina & Benne, Christian (Ed.), Lesegebärden. Universitätsverlag Winter. ISSN 9783825395711. p. 275–301. doi: 10.33675/2024-82538669. Full text in Research Archive
Contzen, Eva von & Kukkonen, Karin (2024). Camilla's traces: Movement as an analytical key to literary history. Orbis Litterarum. ISSN 0105-7510. 79(5), p. 405–422. doi: 10.1111/oli.12443. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
In this article, we develop a framework for the analysis of ‘movement’ in literary texts. We focus on characters, translation and transmission, thereby going beyond, on the one hand, a stylistic analysis of individual passages, and, on the other hand, the linear enchainment of scenes and summaries underlying much of the narratological discussions around movement, speed and pace. We will develop this framework through a discussion of the character Camilla in Vergil's Aeneid: Book XI, Gavin Douglas's Eneados (1513) and John Dryden's Aeneis (1698). Both the version stylistically close to Vergil (Dryden) and the one that is stylistically looser (Douglas) allow for a discussion of movement that takes the principle beyond a primary concern with style. In a final step, we move to the contemporary example of Ursula Le Guin's Lavinia (2008) in order to investigate how ‘movement’ translates from the epic to the novel. Movement, as we shall show, can be analysed as movement of plot, movement of thought, and movement of figure in narrative. The framework that we propose allows for the principled discussion of transgeneric transfer of narratives, here between epic and novel, as well as the comparison of texts from different moments of literary history between the Middle Ages, the Early Modern period and the present day.
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Designing an Expert-Setting for Interdisciplinary Dialogue: Literary Texts as Boundary Objects. Social Epistemology. ISSN 0269-1728. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2270552. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
While literature is often used as a source of examples and illustrations across disciplines, literary studies tends to be underrepresented in interdisciplinary exchanges. Perhaps the reason lies in a lack of understanding what actually is the expertise of literary studies and how this can be useful in interdisciplinary settings. In this article, I propose to outline the expertise of literary scholars through concepts of 4E cognition and to devise a proposal for how such expertise could successfully shape the epistemic common ground of social cognition of experts in interdisciplinary dialogue. Literature involves metacognition centrally through its language style, the design of the narrative and its links to other texts, and literary scholars have the expertise in formulating exactly how this works – in a non-mimetic way – through the analysis and interpretation of literary texts. This very particular expertise and practice of literary scholars enables literary texts to be proposed as a boundary object in interdisciplinary dialogues through a shared epistemic common ground. For this argument, I build on earlier theoretical work in 4E cognition and predictive processing and my experience running interdisciplinary workshops on that model.
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Literature as Uncertainty Practice: An Anomaly at the End of Literature. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte (DVJS). ISSN 0012-0936. 97(4), p. 1143–1152. doi: 10.1007/s41245-023-00219-4. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Abstract Literature emerges as an uncertainty practice in the context of today’s volatile environments. Considering literary texts as linguistic constructions reprogramming our lifeworld through formal constraints and creative rethinking, from the perspective of cognitive literary studies, Karin Kukkonen proposes an argument for the continued relevance of literature.
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Cognitive Formalism; Or: How Presence Machines are Built. In Besser, Stephan & Lysen, Flora (Ed.), Worlding the Brain: Neurocentrism, Cognition and the Challenge of the Arts and Humanities. De Gruyter Brill. ISSN 9789004681286. p. 129–141. doi: 10.1163/9789004681293_010. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Distracted or Mind-Wandering? Readers' Multiple Engagements in Probability Designs. Cahiers voor Literatuurwetenschap. ISSN 2294-1193. 14, p. 41–51. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Multilingual Citizens of the World: Literary Fiction in Norwegian Book Collections in the Eighteenth Century, Literary Citizenship in Scandinavia in the Long Eighteenth Century. Boydell & Brewer. ISSN 9781783277797. p. 117–137. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Sheds new light on European and regional book markets, the development of a public sphere and the impact of new media on intellectual, social, religious and political change.
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Designs on consciousness: Literature and predictive processing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences. ISSN 0962-8436. 379(1895). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0423. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Predictive processing is a recent approach in cognitive science that describes the brain as an engine of probabilistic hierarchical inference. Initially proposed as a general theory of brain function, predictive processing has recently been expanding to account for questions of consciousness in philosophy and neuroscience. In my previous work (Kukkonen 2020 Probability designs: literature and predictive processing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press), I have shown how predictive processing can also be used to model our engagement with literary texts. In this article, I use my account of our engagement with literature in predictive processing terms, as well as recent work on predictive processing and consciousness, to explore how literature can shed light on various aspects of conscious experience, including qualia, counterfactual depth in conscious experience and sense of self. In the final section, I propose a number of theoretical questions that could be addressed by drawing on literature as a source of hypotheses and stimuli for possible experimental designs. The upshot is a picture where literature is not just a source of illustrative examples about conscious experience, but a designer environment through which we can explore and rethink consciousness. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Art, aesthetics and predictive processing: theoretical and empirical perspectives’.
Kukkonen, Karin (2022). The Experience of Narrative: Aesthetics and Embodiment. In Dawson, Paul & Mäkelä, Maria (Ed.), Routledge Companion to Narrative Theory. Routledge. ISSN 9780367569730. p. 397–408. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Østby, Ylva (2022). Readers During the Covid19-Pandemic: Reading Choices, Habits and Emotional Experiences. Scientific Study of Literature. ISSN 2210-4372. doi: 10.1075/ssol.22005.kuk. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2022). Erzählung: Der Roman und die Protokolle der Moderne. In Geulen, Eva & Haas, Claude (Ed.), Formen des Ganzen. Wallstein Verlag. ISSN 9783835339903. p. 343–362. doi: 10.46500/83533990. Full text in Research Archive
Pianzola, Federico; Riva, Giuseppe; Kukkonen, Karin & Mantovani, Fabrizia (2022). Am I present in imaginary worlds? Intentions, actions, and flow in mediated experiences and fiction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ISSN 0140-525X. 45. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X2100220X. Full text in Research Archive
Birke, Dorothee; Contzen, Eva von & Kukkonen, Karin (2022). Chrononarratology: Modelling Historical Change for Narratology. Narrative. ISSN 1063-3685. 30(1), p. 26–46. doi: 10.1353/NAR.2022.0001. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Baumbach, Sibylle (2022). Mind-Wandering and Attention in Literature. DIEGESIS – Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung. 11(2), p. 1–17. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Following a short review of studies of attention, attention economies, and mindwandering with regard to narratives, this paper aims to establish attention and mindwandering as key concepts for the study of literary narratives. Based on an analysis of representations and enactments of both phenomena in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway, we will outline the different levels of mind-wandering and attention in literary texts as well as the different levels on which narratives ‘make minds move.’ Offering a methodological toolkit for investigating aspects of mind-wandering and attention in literary narratives, including key attractors and distractors, this paper sets the frame for the contributions published in this special issue and, more generally, aims to offer the foundation for future studies in this field.
Pianzola, Federico; Riva, Giuseppe; Kukkonen, Karin & Mantovani, Fabrizia (2021). Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing. Open Research Europe. 1. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13193.2. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Presence, flow, narrative absorption, immersion, transportation, and similar subjective phenomena are studied in many different disciplines, mostly in relation to mediated experiences (books, film, VR, games). Moreover, since real, virtual, or fictional agents are often involved, concepts like identification and state empathy are often linked to engaging media use. Based on a scoping review that identified similarities in the wording of various questionnaire items conceived to measure different phenomena, we categorize items into the most relevant psychological aspects and use this categorization to propose an interdisciplinary systematization. Then, based on a framework of embodied predictive processing, we present a new cognitive model of presence-related phenomena for mediated and non-mediated experiences, integrating spatial and temporal aspects and also considering the role of fiction and media design. Key processes described within the model are: selective attention, enactment of intentions, and interoception. We claim that presence is the state of perceived successful agency of an embodied mind able to correctly enact its predictions. The difference between real-life and simulated experiences (“book problem,” “paradox of fiction”) lays in the different precision weighting of exteroceptive and interoceptive signals.
Kukkonen, Karin (2021). Reading, Fast and Slow. Poetics Today. ISSN 0333-5372. 42(2), p. 173–191. doi: 10.1215/03335372-8883192. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Abstract Reading literature is often contrasted to the use of digital media in terms of speed. While readers engage slowly with a book, they rush through digital environments at an ever faster pace. This article argues against a simple binary between slow/literary and fast/digital. This binary is in fact not native to the public debate about literature in the digital age but can be traced back from the digital revolution to modernist attitudes on literature, as they emerge in Viktor Shklovsky and Walter Benjamin. Drawing on results about reading speed in reading science and on current narrative theory, this article devises an alternative argument for literary reading as a process that unfolds over multiple time scales linked to different layers of meaning making. Reading literature, from this perspective, is not exclusively slow but, rather, works through a combination of both fast and slow processes. The article develops its argument through the example of Alexander Pushkin's classic novella “The Queen of Spades” and then applies this new theoretical account of multispeed literary reading to two novels engaging explicitly with the digital revolution.
Kukkonen, Karin (2021). Zukunft als Vergangenheit: Über Zangenbewegungen im zeitgenössischen Erzählen. Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte (ZIG). ISSN 1863-8937. 15(3), p. 131–137. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2020). Coda: Literature, Language and Creativity. Cognitive Semantics. ISSN 2352-6408. 13(1). doi: 10.1515/cogsem-2020-2030. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2020). Does Cognition Translate? Predictions, Plot and World Literature. Poetics Today. ISSN 0333-5372. 41(2), p. 243–260. doi: 10.1215/03335372-8172556. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Comparative literature and cognitive literary studies both consider literature as a worldwide phenomenon. The move toward world literature in comparative literature made salient the issue of reading some texts in translation, and world literature turned its attention to whether texts are entirely translatable and how center and periphery in the “world republic of literature” are organized around languages that are predominantly translated (or translated into). This article proposes that cognitive literary studies and comparative literature could enter into conversation around the topic of language differences and translation. For cognitive literary studies, the approaches of predictive processing and embodied cognition have in recent years developed the conceptual means to include these differences in our discussions without falling back on the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Language shapes thought, but it does so in a flexible exchange between verbal markers and language-created contexts. The author models this exchange for literary texts by means of salient verbal markers that indicate plot events and outlines possible shared avenues of future research for cognitive literary studies and comparative literature along these lines. The examples discussed are the Finnish national epic Kalevala, its French and English translations, and the contemporary novel Sankarit by Johanna Sinisalo.
Kukkonen, Karin (2020). Kognitiv litteraturforskning: Att se sig själv tänka. In Cullhed, Sigrid Schottenius; Hedberg, Andreas & Svedjedal, Johan (Ed.), Litteraturvetenskap II. Studentlitteratur AB. ISSN 9789144136257. p. 247–264. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2020). The Self and Subjectivity: Why the Enlightenment is Relevant for Posthumanism. In Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl & Wamberg, Jacob (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic. ISSN 9781350090477. p. 25–34. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2020). The Speed of Plot: Narrative Acceleration and Deceleration. Orbis Litterarum. ISSN 0105-7510. 75(2), p. 73–85. doi: 10.1111/oli.12251. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
When characters travel 'at the speed of plot', they need to arrive at the conclusion of the story by the time the narrative comes to its end on the page. This article develops the popular notion of 'plot speed' into a conceptual contribution to the study of time in narrative. 'Plot speed' is the conceptual velocity of movement through plot events, and it can be rooted in the physical speed of the storyworld (where characters are in a rush) or the discourse speed (where the written form of the narrative indicates chapters, instalments, and so on). I investigate configurations of plot speed through Dumas’s The Three Musketeers, its precursor Courtilz de Sandras’s Mémoires de M. d’Artagnan, and the manuscripts in which Dumas collaborated with Auguste Maquet, thus arguing for narratological investigations that are situated in contexts of literary history and media changes.
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). The Literary Designer Environments of Eighteenth-Century Jesuit Poetics. In Anderson, Miranda; Rousseau, George & Wheeler, Michael (Ed.), Distributed Cognition in Enlightenment and Romantic Culture. Edinburgh University Press. ISSN 9781474442282. p. 187–203. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474442282.003.0011. Full text in Research Archive
Jajdelska, Elspeth; Anderson, Miranda; Butler, Christopher; Fabb, Nigel; Finnigan, Elizabeth & Garwood, Ian [Show all 11 contributors for this article] (2019). Picture this: A review of research relating to narrative processing by moving image versus language. Frontiers in Psychology. 10:1161, p. 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01161. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Reading fiction for pleasure is robustly correlated with improved cognitive attainment and other benefits. It is also in decline among young people in developed nations, in part because of competition from moving image fiction. We review existing research on the differences between reading or hearing verbal fiction and watching moving image fiction, as well as looking more broadly at research on image or text interactions and visual versus verbal processing. We conclude that verbal narrative generates more diverse responses than moving image narrative. We note that reading and viewing narrative are different tasks, with different cognitive loads. Viewing moving image narrative mostly involves visual processing with some working memory engagement, whereas reading narrative involves verbal processing, visual imagery, and personal memory (Xu et al., 2005). Attempts to compare the two by creating equivalent stimuli and task demands face a number of challenges. We discuss the difficulties of such comparative approaches. We then investigate the possibility of identifying lower level processing mechanisms that might distinguish cognition of the two media and propose internal scene construction and working memory as foci for future research. Although many of the sources we draw on concentrate on English-speaking participants in European or North American settings, we also cover material relating to speakers of Dutch, German, Hebrew, and Japanese in their respective countries, and studies of a remote Turkish mountain community.
Fabry, Regina & Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Reconsidering the Mind-Wandering Reader: Predictive Processing, Probability Designs and Enculturation. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02648. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Studies on mind-wandering frequently use reading as an experimental task. In these studies, reading is conceived as a cognitive process that potentially offers a contrast to mind-wandering, because it seems to be task-related, goal-directed and stimulus-dependent. More recent work attempts to avoid the dichotomy of successful cognitive processes and processes of mind-wandering found in earlier studies. We approach the issue from the perspective that texts provoke modes of cognitive involvement different from the information processing and recall account that underlies many early mind-wandering studies. After all, reading itself is an umbrella term for activities that are characterized by a variety of phenomenological and functional signatures. We conceptualize reading and mind-wandering in relation to each other through the framework of enculturated predictive processing, which is informed by research in literary studies. Earlier accounts think of reading predominantly in terms of the construction of situation models that organize textual information. By contrast, enculturated predictive processing foregrounds shifting stances readers can take in relation to the text. Characters featuring in literary texts might be mind-wandering themselves, or passages in literary style might make the construction of a clearly defined situational model impossible. Furthermore, we take into account that texts often elicit mind-wandering through the construction of task-relevant and attention-driven virtual scenarios in readers' minds. This more complex account of reading can enrich recent attempts to understand mind-wandering as a complex, multi-dimensional phenomenon. The study of mind-wandering can benefit, we argue, from a closer attention to the process of reading and to the texts it deploys as stimuli. The emerging perspective from enculturated predictive processing and literary studies makes distinctions in reading that in turn enable research on mind-wandering to ask more precise questions about (1) different kinds of mind-wandering, (2) different modes of reading, and (3) how and where they interconnect across time.
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Gebrochene Reihen: Narratologie, Erwartungshorizonte und Stoffgeschichte. Beiträge zur mediävistischen Erzählforschung. doi: 10.25619/BmE2019234. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Handlung und Handlungslogik -- Frühe Neuzeit. In Contzen, Eva von & Tilg, Stefan (Ed.), Handbuch Historische Narratologie. Verlag J. B. Metzler. ISSN 9783476047137. p. 262–271. doi: 10.1007/978-3-476-04714-4_24. Full text in Research Archive
Cepic, Ana Vogrincic & Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Practices and Technologies Across Two Reading Revolutions: Reading the Eighteenth Century into the Twenty-First. International Journal of the Book. ISSN 1447-9516. 17(1), p. 27–37. doi: 10.18848/1447-9516/CGP/v17i01/27-37. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Reading by Proxy: A Visit to the Literary Archive. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 6(1). doi: 10.1080/23311983.2019.1687271. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
If literature is an archive of cognitive constellations, then readers can revisit these experiences from different periods and ages. How familiar, however, does a reader have to be with a particular historical context in order to browse the literary archive freely? This article will develop a cognitive perspective on intertextual references, arguing that texts often provide the necessary context knowledge themselves. Readers can read “by proxy”, so to speak. Narrators might explain the intertextual reference or enact its salient features in pastiches. Characters might learn about the texts mentioned and discuss their implications in conversation with other characters. A range of strategies for reading by proxy will be introduced on the example of Christoph Martin Wieland’s novel Don Sylvio von Rosalva. Even though few readers today will be familiar with the chivalric romance, the French fairy tale and the picaresque, all genres on which Wieland draws, they can easily follow the structure of references in the novel through reading by proxy. In this sense, literary texts carry their own archive and remain accessible across periods. Reading by proxy is then linked to precision expectations in predictive processing. Its strategies do not provide an exact prediction of what is likely to happen next but rather guide readers’ attention and enable them to trace larger configurations. Wieland’s use of reading by proxy, I shall argue, also marks a moment in the development of the German novel and, thereby, tracing these strategies can contribute to literary history.
Kukkonen, Karin; Kuzmičová, Anežka; Polvinen, Merja & Christiansen, Steen Ledet (2019). The place of the cognitive in literary studies. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 6(1). doi: 10.1080/23311983.2019.1691841. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Exploring Inner Perceptions: Interoception, Literature and Mindfulness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. ISSN 1355-8250. 26(11-12), p. 107–132. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
This article establishes a connection between the novel, as a cultural artefact which encourages the exploration of inner perceptions, literary reading, and recent research into interoception in cognitive psychology. Interoception is broadly conceived here, ranging from physical states (like pulse, breathing rate, etc.) to emotions and the conscious perception of these physical states. The article identifies relevant interoceptive mechanisms in literary reading and develops a research programme for their empirical study. It unfolds an account of the relationship between interoception and exteroception, as well as critical concepts to capture how readers' interoception aligns with the embodied signature of the text ('interoceptive attunement') and how the text offers points of re-entry after readers' remindings ('interoceptive anchors'). The article closes with a discussion of the role of interoception in the investigation of mindfulness meditation, and how this might enable an empirical comparison between the two cultural practices of mindfulness meditation and literary reading.
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). The curse of realism: Cognitive narratology and the historical dimension. Partial Answers. ISSN 1565-3668. 16(2), p. 291–302. doi: 10.1353/pan.2018.0020. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Monika Fludernik’s Toward a Natural Narratology (1996) develops a detailed historical account of how the textual structures of experientiality identified in the theoretical framework have developed in English fiction since the 17th century. According to Fludernik’s account, the English novel gets progressively better at matching the cognitive schemata underlying such experientiality. The present article argues, however, that such an understanding of the historical dimension of experientiality is an instance of “the curse of realism,” that is, of discussing early modern texts in light of the expectations established by 19th-century realism. It proposes an alternative model for engaging with the historical dimension of cognitive narratology, which is rooted in embodied cognition and predictive processing.
Caracciolo, Marco & Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Hitting the Wall? The Rhetorical Approach and the Role of Reader Response (Response to Phelan). Style. ISSN 0039-4238. 52(1-2), p. 45–50. doi: 10.1353/sty.2018.0005. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). The Fully Extended Mind. In Dinnen, Zara & Warhol, Robyn (Ed.), The Edinburgh Companion for Contemporary Narrative Theory. Edinburgh University Press. ISSN 9781474424745. p. 56–66. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Genre Fiction in the Graphic Novel: The Case of Science Fiction. In Baetens, Jan M.; Frey, Hugo & Tabachnik, Stephen (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the Graphic Novel. Cambridge University Press. ISSN 9781316759981. p. 476–491. doi: 10.1017/9781316759981.029. Full text in Research Archive
Alber, Jan; Caracciolo, Marco; Iversen, Stefan; Kukkonen, Karin & Nielsen, Henrik Skov (2018). Introduction: Unnatural and Cognitive Perspectives on Narrative (A Theory Crossover). Poetics Today. ISSN 0333-5372. 39(3), p. 429–445. doi: 10.1215/03335372-7032676. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
This special issue presents a “crossover” between two strands of contemporary narrative theory: a second-generation cognitive approach that foregrounds the linkage of stories, mind, and the human body; and an unnatural approach, which focuses on narratives that depart from and challenge everyday cognitive parameters, including those involved in so-called literary realism. In this introduction to the special issue, we take our cue from Franz Kafka’s “ Wish to Become a Red Indian” (a paragraph-long short story) to illustrate these ways of theorizing about narrative and to discuss the conceptual divides that separate them. From an unnatural perspective, the cognitive approach flattens narrative to real-world psychology; from a cognitive perspective, the unnatural approach ignores the way that every narrative, no matter how challenging or innovative, exploits our cognitive makeup. By examining these assumptions and by tracing the history of cognitive and unnatural models of narrative, this special issue seeks to move beyond a conceptual standoff between them. The essays collected in the issue demonstrate that it is possible to combine a cognitive approach with an interest in unnatural stories—or, conversely, an unnatural approach and attention to the cognitive and embodied dynamics of narrative. In addition to previewing the arguments advanced in the articles, this introduction explicates the innovative method of scholarly collaboration through which the articles came about, and the different results it produced in each case.
Kukkonen, Karin & Nielsen, Henrik Skov (2018). Fictionality: Cognition and exceptionality. Poetics Today. ISSN 0333-5372. 39(3), p. 473–494. doi: 10.1215/03335372-7032704. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Cognitive and unnatural approaches to literature take very different stances on the issue of fictionality. While cognitive approaches consider everyday nonfictional and literary fictional narratives to highlight their similarities, unnatural approaches to narrative stress the exceptionality of the fictional. This article investigates disagreements and potential points of mutual interest in a dialogue between Henrik Skov Nielsen, representing unnatural narratology, and Karin Kukkonen, representing second-generation cognitive narratology. The dialogue develops through close readings of Ian McEwan’s On Chesil Beach and Hilary Mantel’s Beyond Black. In a first step, Nielsen defines fictionality for unnatural approaches to fiction as “invention.” Kukkonen argues that there are many mental operations that qualify as invented, such as thought experiments and flights of the imagination, but that do not yet amount to fiction. To arrive at a cognitive definition of fictionality, she proposes to revisit Wolfgang Iser’s notion of fiction as an “articulated gestalt” in the light of recent embodied and predictive approaches. In a second step, we discuss the so-called exceptionality thesis. The issue at stake here is whether fictional texts are fundamentally dependent on our general cognitive capacities (a position traditionally held by cognitive narratology) or fundamentally depart from everyday modes of thinking. We revisit the debate in light of the unnatural definition of fictionality as invention and the cognitive perspectives gained through embodied and predictive approaches and arrive at the position that the exceptional does not necessarily defy the cognitive.
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). A moving target – cognitive narratology and feminism. Textual Practice. ISSN 0950-236X. 32(6), p. 973–989. doi: 10.1080/0950236X.2018.1486543. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
The present article develops a feminist approach to cognitive narratology on the basis of recent work in embodied cognition. Cognitive narratology does not traditionally consider gender perspectives, for a variety of reasons, none the least because the gendering of brains into ‘male’ and ‘female’ is deeply problematic. Contemporary cognitive narratology moves its point of interest however from the brain to the larger connections between brain, body and their situatedness in the world. From this new, embodied approach to cognition, we work toward a feminist dimension for cognitive narratology, drawing on issues of performativity, habitus and interpellation and highlighting the degree to which the notion of embodiment brings together both cognitive and cultural aspects of narrative. On the example of Hilary Mantel’s short story ‘The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher’ (2014), we outline the complex ways in which narration, body images/body schemata, and metaphors interact and how these interactions can be analysed by an embodied feminist narratology that takes seriously both the embodied engagements of reading narrative and the edge within it that literature reveals.
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Frances Greville's "A Prayer for Indifference: The Limits of Sentiment. English Literature. Theories, Interpretations, Contexts. ISSN 2385-1635. 1(5). doi: 10.30687/EL/2420-823X/2018/05/008. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
[English translation of "A Prayer for Indifference": Die Grenzen der Gefühlskultur published in Das Achtzehnte Jahrhundert in 2015]
Caracciolo, Marco; Guédon, Cécile; Kukkonen, Karin & Müller, Sabine (2017). The Promise of an Embodied Narratology: Integrating Cognition, Representation and Interpretation. In Hansen, Per Krogh; Pier, John; Roussin, Philippe & Schmid, Wolf (Ed.), Emerging Vectors of Narratology. De Gruyter Brill. ISSN 9783110555189. p. 435–459. doi: 10.1515/9783110555158-021. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2017). Adventures in Duck-rabbitry: Multistable elements of graphic narrative. Narrative. ISSN 1063-3685. 25(3), p. 342–358. doi: 10.1353/nar.2017.0018. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Multistability refers to those moments in a narrative when readers are made aware of two mutually exclusive possibilities, conceived as an analogy to the visual illusion of the duck-rabbit, which can be seen either as a duck or as a rabbit, but not as both at the same time. Such mutually exclusive possibilities can arise from image elements that have different functions in different panels, words that refer to different things in the dialogue and the panel images, narration that can be read as either extra-or intradiegetic, or, indeed, moments of hesitation whether a metalepsis (a transgression of narrative boundaries) has taken place or not. Duck-rabbitry, that is, the tendency to create multistable moments (or instances that mimick the "tilt" between one percept and another), is a narrative effect in its own right and therefore needs to be distinguished from multiperspective, polyphonic narration, and allegory (because, in these cases, the two possibilities are not mutually exclusive), as well as from irony (because, in this case, one possibility is considered superior to the other). It extends across the narrative space of the fictional world, the narrative time of the plot construction, and the experience of the reader, leading to particular effects of fluency and rupture. While this article foregrounds comics as a medium that is particularly prone to duck-rabbitry, the conclusion also draws attention to its occurrence in other media and its importance for the project of transmedial narratology.
Kukkonen, Karin (2017). Fantastic Cognition. In Burke, Michael & Troscianko, Emily (Ed.), Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues between Literature and Cognition. Oxford University Press. ISSN 9780190496869. p. 151–167. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780190496869.003.0009. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
According to recent developments in predictive processing and Bayesian cognition, our thinking is fantastic: we grasp the world through predictive, probabilistic models that we compare against the feedback from the actual environment, which really only plays a significant role if it proves our predictions to be wrong and forces us to revise the probabilistic model. Rather than our eyes and brains registering every detail of the environment and configuring it into the larger whole of the percept, perception works the other way around. We already know what we are likely to perceive on the basis of our predictive probabilistic models (or ‘fantasies’) and correct these only if discrepancies with the environment create prediction errors. The predictive processing model of cognition, with its feedback loops of virtual models and prediction errors, has in recent years been extended into many other areas of the cognitive sciences, from perception to motor control, from emotions to our sense of self (see Clark and Hohwy for comprehensive overviews). Not only perception but cognition more generally might turn out to be nothing short of fantastic. The predictive, probabilistic models of perception and cognition which Frith and Friston gloss as “fantasies” are, as we shall see, usually not noticed in everyday life. Tzvetan Todorov’s definition of the literary genre of “the fantastic”, as a genre that makes us hesitate between “truth” and “illusion”, however, suggests that literary texts might often test boundaries and highlight the workings of such cognitive models. As I will go on to show, the fantastic in literature throws “fantastic cognition” into relief. This is an accepted version of a chapter published in Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues between Literature and Cognition, eds. Michael Burke and Emily Troscianko. © 2017 Oxford University Press
Kukkonen, Karin (2017). Problems of Tellability in German Eighteenth-Century Criticism and Novel-Writing. In Steinby, Liisa & Mäkikalli, Aino (Ed.), Narrative Concepts in the Study of Eighteenth-Century Literature. Amsterdam University Press. ISSN 9789089648747. p. 177–198. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt1wn0r6q.10. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
This is an accepted version of a chapter in the book Narrative Concepts in the Study of Eighteenth-Century Literature, eds. Liisa Steinby and Aino Mäkikalli. © 2017 Amsterdam University Press

View all works in NVA

Kukkonen, Karin (2025). Creativity and Contingency in Literary Writing. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 9781350522671. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
The first book to investigate, analyze and theorize the creative processes of literary writers, Creativity and Contingency in Literary Writing uses author interviews, manuscript genetics and textual evidence to explore creativity from the authorial perspective. Studying an author's practice, literary form and contextual contingencies as elements that affect literary creativity, Karin Kukkoken develops theoretical models for examining the age-old problem of artistic creation and how it has been put to works by authors from the nineteenth century to the age of digital fiction, across a range of languages. With insights from the cognitive sciences, anthropology and philosophy of mind as well as literary studies, the book calls upon interviews with Siri Hustvedt, Marina Warner, Anne Weber, Camille Laurens, Gwenaëlle Aubry, Kate Pullinger, Gunnhild Øyehaug, Maria Stepanova and György Dragomán and studies the manuscripts of Charlotte Brontë, Cora Sandel, Elsa Morante and Italo Calvino. Overcoming the traditional distinction between creative agent, process and creative product, Creativity and Contingency in Literary Writing is as accessible and illuminating as it is important to understandings of human creativity.
Caracciolo, Marco & Kukkonen, Karin (2021). With Bodies: Narrative Theory and Embodied Cognition. Ohio State University Press. ISBN 9780814214800. 226 p. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2020). Probability Designs: Literature and Predictive Processing. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780190050955. 225 p. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). 4E Cognition and Eighteenth-Century Fiction: How the Novel Found its Feet. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780190913045. 264 p. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2017). A Prehistory of Cognitive Poetics: Neoclassicism and the Novel. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780190634766. 263 p. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

Kukkonen, Karin (2026). A Response to Caracciolo’s Reply to “Designing an Expert Setting for Interdisciplinary Dialogue”. Social Epistemology Review and reply Collective. ISSN 2471-9560. 15(1), p. 1–6. doi: https:/wp.me/p1Bfg0-aKd. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
The response is written dialogue with Marco Caracciolo's reply to my article "Designing and Expert Setting for Interdisciplinary Dialogue", explaining and clarifying the method of deploying literary texts in order to facilitate interdisciplinary dialogue.
Kukkonen, Karin (2024). The Speed of Plot: Narrative Acceleration and Deceleration. In Caracciolo, Marco & Minzagova, Ella (Ed.), Slow Narrative Across Media. Ohio State University Press. ISSN 9780814215678. p. 17–35. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2024). Authors’ Companions? Imagined Selves in Writing Literary Fiction (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2024). Creativity and Contingency: A 4/5 Perspective (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Manuscripts and Material Agency: Shaping Space and Time on Paper (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Rhythm, Speed and Probabilities: Pacing the Reader's Imagination (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Creative Pas de Deux: Novelists' Engagement with Literary History (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Contingent Selves in Creative Writing (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2023). Studying Creativity: Cognitive Poetics and Interviews (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Mutti, Chiara (2022). Cognitive Literary Studies: A Conversation with Marco Caracciolo, Monika Fludernik, Patrick Colm Hogan and Karin Kukkonen. [Journal]. Enthymema (Italy). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2022). Beyond Rules? Getting it 'Right' in the Eighteenth-Century Novel (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin; Aubry, Gwenaëlle; Weber, Anne & Øyehaug, Gunnhild (2022). Écrire le hasard / Writing Chance (Interview Series). [Internet]. https://hasard.hypotheses.org/4855. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin; Caracciolo, Marco & Beltrami, Marzia (2022). Online book presentation of "Spatial Plots: Virtuality and the Embodied Mind in Baricco, Camilleri and Calvino". [Internet]. Zoom. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2021). Review of Aleksandr Puškin: Russlands store dikter by Erik Egeberg. Scando-Slavica. ISSN 0080-6765. 67(2), p. 294–296. Full text in Research Archive
Guth, Stephan & Kukkonen, Karin (2021). The Literature of the Middle East. [Internet]. LCE Podcast. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Stephan Guth, Professor of Middle East Studies, talks to Karin Kukkonen about the Arab novel in the context of social and political reform in Middle East countries. He explains how reading novels could “teach” people how to feel in modern society, why historical romance novels were considered useful entertainment in the 19th century, and discusses the function of emotional storytelling in the Middle East’s confrontation with Europe.
Kukkonen, Karin (2021). Memory and Mind-Wandering in the Attention Economy: Some Cases from Scandinavian Literature (Keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Buer, Liz (2021). Interview: Litteratur gir støtte og trøst. [Journal]. Psykisk Helse. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2021). Distracted Readers: Narratology and its Neglects (keynote). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2021). Review of Improbability, Chance and the Nineteenth-Century Realist Novel by Adam Grener. Review19. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Auestad, Reiko Abe (2021). Noveller i Øst og Vest! Foredrag og samtale om japansk og vestlig novelletradisjon. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Langford, Malcolm (2020). Å tro på en fortelling: Litteratur, lover og sannsynlighet. [Internet]. HumSam Biblioteket. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2020). Review of Tommy Sandberg, The Difference Approach to Narrative Fiction- A Recurring Critique of Narratology and its Implications for the Study of Novels and Short Stories. Samlaren: tidsskrift för forskning om svensk och annan nordisk litteratur. ISSN 0348-6133. 141, p. 204–208. Full text in Research Archive
Davanger, Svend; Kukkonen, Karin & Eifring, Halvor Bøyesen (2020). Tankestrømmens tidsalder - Hvordan hjernen finner hvile i litteratur, meditasjon og hverdagsliv. Full text in Research Archive
Guth, Stephan; Pepe, Teresa & Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Book launch "Literary Visions of the Middle East" (compl./comm./ed. by S. Guth). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin; Pullinger, Kate & Hayler, Matthew (2019). Digital Fiction: Samtale mellom Kate Pullinger, Matt Hayler og Karin Kukkonen. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Hva er vi eksperter på? Litteraturforskning og tverrfaglighet. Full text in Research Archive
Festøy, Elin; Rustad, Hans Kristian Strandstuen & Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Litteraturscena: De nye fortellingene. Full text in Research Archive
Fialho, Olivia & Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Reading Workshop Organizers. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Østby, Ylva (2019). Litterær tankevandring -- hvorfor det ikke er galskap å lese bøker. [Journal]. Kritikeren. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Vogel, Juliane (2019). Findekuenste in der Literatur: Vom Schatzhaus zum Mash-up. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin & Hustvedt, Siri (2019). Minner om fremtiden: Siri Hustvedt og Karin Kukkonen i samtale. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2019). Cognition, Good and Bad (Review of Vera Tobin, Elements of Surprise). Cambridge quarterly. ISSN 0008-199X. 48(2), p. 167–171. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). The Cognitive Work of Form. Full text in Research Archive
Malabou, Catherine; Kukkonen, Karin & Rathe, Kaja Jenssen (2018). Litteratur på Blå: Catherine Malabou og den plastiske hjerne. Full text in Research Archive
Williams, Abigail & Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Books as a Social Medium. A Conversation on Reading. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin; Østby, Ylva & Eifring, Halvor Bøyesen (2018). Mind-Wandering, Meditasjon og Litteratur. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Kunnskapens Former. Vinduet. ISSN 0042-6288. 2, p. 121–124. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Review of Sean Silver, The Mind is a Collection. The Scriblerian. ISSN 0036-9640. 50(2), p. 173–175. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Francois Ozon's "8 femmes" and Predictive Processing. Full text in Research Archive
Malabou, Catherine; Rathe, Kaja Jensen & Kukkonen, Karin (2018). Malabou og den plastiske hjerne (Malabou and the Plastic Brain). Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2017). Handlung / Plot. In Huber, Martin & Schmid, Wolf (Ed.), Grundthemen der Literaturwissenschaft: Erzählen. De Gruyter Brill. ISSN 9783110401189. p. 278–298. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin; Cave, Terence & Cullhed, Eric (2017). Cognitive Poetics. A Conversation. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2017). The Self-Organising Plot. Full text in Research Archive
Kukkonen, Karin (2017). An Argument from Design: Literature and Predictive Processing. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

Published Sep. 23, 2015 1:09 PM - Last modified Dec. 19, 2025 12:25 PM

Karin Kukkonen

Academic interests

Earlier Projects

Courses taught

Publications

Projects

Completed projects

Research groups

Networks